BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//sea-treaties.og//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.30.10//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
UID:12012e2b-7677-48e8-aed7-92c44f8668bd
X-WR-CALNAME:iCagenda
X-WR-CALDESC:Event Management Extension for Joomla!
X-WR-RELCALID:3E26604A-50F4-4449-8B3E-E4F4932D05B5
X-WR-TIMEZONE:UTC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:25980681-d8dd-4b14-ba1c-80e704c4cc2b
DTSTAMP:20260624T014149Z
CATEGORIES:Events
CLASS:PUBLIC
DESCRIPTION;ALTREP="CID:<FFFF__=0ABBE548DFE235B58f9e8a93d@coffeebean.com>":
 \nAt the Eighth ENIUGH (European Network in Universal and Global History) 
 in Växjö\, Stefan Amirell and Ariel Lopez chair a panel entitled Between I
 ndigenous Agency and Imperial Expansion: Treaties and Treaty-making in Afr
 ica\, Asia\, Oceania and the Americas. In addition to a paper by Amirell\,
  the stellar panel features presentations by Saliha Belmessous\, Edward Ke
 ene\, and Inge Van Hulle.\n&nbsp\;\nThe publication of the volume&nbsp\;Em
 pire by Treaty\, edited by Saliha Belmessous\, in 2015\, stimulated a rene
 wed interest in the role of international treaties and treaty-making in th
 e context of modern imperialism. Whereas the orthodox view\, which emerged
  in the context of mid-twentieth century decolonisation\, regarded treatie
 s primarily as unequal instruments of Western imperialism\, obtained large
 ly by means of gunboat diplomacy\, recent research in the fields of global
  history\, new diplomatic history\, and the history of international law h
 as yielded a more nuanced and multi-facetted picture of the crucial role o
 f treaties and treaty-making in colonial and imperial contexts. Researcher
 s have for example highlighted how cross-cultural diplomatic encounters an
 d personal relations influenced treaty-making processes\, how Europeans tr
 ied to fit purportedly traditional practices of diplomacy and inter-polity
  relations into the international treaty-system\, how non-European actors 
 actively used treaties as a means of promoting their interests\, how non-s
 tate actors frequently initiated treaty-making processes\, and how individ
 ual treaties often were part of larger\, long-term treaty-making projects 
 promoted by leading international treaty parties. Other topics that have b
 een explored include the sometimes flawed anthropological understanding of
  how treaties were understood by non-Europeans\, the substantial differenc
 es in the existing versions in different languages of the treaties and the
 ir subsequent paper-trails\, e.g. with regard to biases and misrepresentat
 ions in the published and digitized versions of the treaties that to this 
 day provide the main sources for research in the field.\nTen years after t
 he publication of&nbsp\;Empire by Treaty\, this panel takes stock of the c
 urrent research in the field of treaties and treaty-making in imperial set
 tings. It highlights some of the major research efforts currently underway
  on treaty-making in different parts of the world that were affected by Eu
 ropean colonialism and imperialism.\n
DTSTART:20250910T143000Z
DTEND:20250910T163000Z
GEO:00;0
LOCATION:M1088\, Linnaeus University\, Vaxjo.
ORGANIZER:
SEQUENCE:1
SUMMARY:Congress Panel: Treaty-making in Comparative Perspective
TRANSP:OPAQUE
URL:https://sea-treaties.org/index.php/component/icagenda/31-congress-panel
 -treaty-making-in-comparative-perspective?Itemid=101
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
